глава ІІІ(А)(2).-Париж: ОЄСР, 2003.
136. Підприємницьке середовище у 2006 році: створення нових робочих місць. Україна.-Вашингтон: Міжнародний банк реконструкції та розвитку, 2005. - 85с.
137. Українська асоціація інвестиційного бізнесу. Проект Концепції розвитку корпоративного управління в Україні.- К.: УАІБ, 2006, доступна за адресою www.uaib.com.ua/files/articles/169/85_4.doc.
138. Robin Hollington, Minority Shareholders' Rights. Second Edition.-London: Sweet & Mawwell, 1994.
139. Protection of Minority Shareholders (Mathias W. Stecher ed.) - London: Kluwer Law International, 1997.
140. Coffee John C, Jr. & Schwartz Donald E. The Survival of the Derivative Suit: An Evaluation and a Proposal For Legislative Reform, 81 Colum. L. Rev. 1981.
141. Cox James D. Compensation, Deterrence and Market. 52 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1984.
142. Daniel J.H. Greenwood, Fictional Shareholders: for Whom Are Corporate Managers Trustees, Revisited, 69 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1021 (1996).
143. Daniel J.H. Greenwood, Fictional Shareholders: for Whom Are Corporate Managers Trustees, Revisited, 69 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1021 (1996).
144. Jensen M. & Meckling W., Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure // Journal of Financial Economics.-1976.-№ 3.-pp. 305-360.
145. Black, B., 1992. Agents Watching Agents: The Promise of institutional Investor Voice, UCLA Law Review 39, pp. 811-893.
146. Arlt, A., Bervoets, C., Grechenig, K., Kalss, S., 2002. The Societas Europaea in Relation to the Public Corporations of Five Member States (France, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Austria), European Business Organization Law Review 3:4, pp. 733-764
147. Surowitz v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 383 U.S. 363, 371 (1966).
148. James E. Post, Lee E. Preston & Sybille Sachs, Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth (2002).
149. Hans van Zon, The Political Economy of Independent Ukraine, 100 (2000).
150. O'Neal F. Н. & Thompson R. O'Neal's Oppression of Minority Shareholders-Protecting Minority Rights on Squeez-Outs and Other Intracorporate Conflicts. 2nd Ed.-St. Paul: West Group, 1999.
151. Barclay, M., Holderness, C., 1989. Private benefits from control of public corporations, Journal of Financial Economics 25, pp. 371-395.
152. Admati, A., Pfleiderer, P., Zechner, J., 1994. Large shareholder activism, risk sharing, and financial market equilibrium, Journal of Political Economy 102, pp. 1097-1130.
153. Koessler Maximilian, The Stockholder's Suit: A Comparative View / Columbia Law Review.-1946.-Vol. 46, No. 2.-pp. 238-254.
154. Charles M. Elson, Director Compensation and the Management-Captured Board: the History of a Symptom and a Cure, 50 SMU L. Rev. 127 (1996).
155. Julian Velasco, Structural Bias and the Need for Substantive Review, 82 Wash. U.L.Q. 821 (2004), reprinted in 47 Corp. Prac. Commentator 679 (2005).
156. Loewenstein, M., 1999. Shareholder Derivative Litigation and Corporate Governance, Delaware Journal of Corporate Law 24, pp. 1-26.
157. Management. A Functional and Comparative Analysis, RabelsZ 68, pp. 288-327.
158. Michael J. Whincop, Corporate Governance in Government Corporations 162 (2005).
159. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 549 (1949).
160. Ehud Kamar, A Regulatory Competition Theory of Indeterminacy in Corporate Law // 98 Colum. L. Rev. 1908 (1998).
161. Douglas M. Branson, The American Law Institute Principles of Corporate Governance and Structure and the Derivative Action: A View from the Other Side, 43 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 399 (1986).
162. Shareholder Derivative Litigation: Besieging the Board.-Milano: ALM Books, 600 pp.
163. Julian Velasco, The Fundamental Rights of the Shareholder, 40 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 407 (2006).
164. Roberta Romano, The Shareholder Suit: Litigation Without Foundation.-7 J. Law &Econ. Org. 55 (1991).
165. McLennan, A., 1985. Justifiable Beliefs in Sequential Equilibria, Econometrica 53, No. 4.
166. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.-Eagan: West, 2005.-231 pp.
167. Marshallds H. H., Review of Aron Yoran's Insider Trading in Israel and England / The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 1 (Jan., 1974)
168. Hollington R. Minority Shareholders' Rights.-London: Sweet&Maxwell, 1994.
169. Luca Enriques & Paolo Volpin, Corporate Governance Reforms in Continental Europe // Journal of Economic Perspectives.-2007.- Vol. 21.- Issue 1.
170. Margaret Blair & Lynn A. Stout, A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law, 24 J. Corp. L. 751 (1999).
171. Grossmann, S., Hart, O., 1983. An Analysis of the Principal Agent Problem, Econometrica 51, pp. 7-46.
172. Henry N. Butler & Fred S. McChesney, Why They Give at the Office: Shareholder Welfare and Corporate Philanthropy in the Contractual Theory of the Corporation, 84 Cornell L. Rev. 1195 (1999).
173. Credit Lyonnais Bank Nederaland v. Pathe Communication Corp, Civ. A. No. 12150, 1991 Del. Ch. LEXIS 215 (Del. Ch. Dec. 30, 1991);
174. Edward E. Stocker, Derivative Suit: Its Limitations and a Suggestion / 29 Geo. L.J. 363 (1940).
175. Geyer v. Ingersoll Publications Co., 621 A.2d 784, 787 (Del. Ch. 1992).
176. Peoples Department Stores Inc. (Trustee of) v. Wise, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 461. Рішення Верховного Суду Канади.
177. Deborah A. DeMott. Shareholder Derivative Actions Law & Practice. West Group. 2002.
178. American Law Institute Principles of Corporate Governance, § 7.02, Reporter's Note 2.
179. Alchian, A., Demsetz, H., 1972. Production, Information Costs and Economic Organization, American Economic Review 62, pp. 777-795.
180. Berle A.. & Means G. The Modern Corporation and Private Property (1932).
181. Diamond, D., 1989. Reputation acquisition in debt markets, Journal of Political Economy 97, pp. 828-862.
182. William A. Klein & John C. Coffee, Jr., Business Organization and Finance: Legal and Economic Principles (2004).
183. Vanderbilt Law Review 57, pp. 1747.
184. Принципи корпоративного управління Організації економічного співр
- Київ+380960830922